Ecotourism is a form of nature-based tourism that is often
used as a front for conservation of biodiversity around the world. However,
there is much debate among the literature as to whether ecotourism is
sustainable or not. Does it conserve biodiversity while providing a local
economy or is it just a front to entice well-meaning travellers and take their
money?
Ecotourism allows places like this to be experienced while keeping it in pristine condition. Taken from: http://www.virginisles.com/ecotourism.php |
Krüger (2005) carried out a meta-analysis of 188 cases of ecotourism to see how ecologically sustainable it is. He found that 63% of ecotourism cases were sustainable, but mentions that this may well be an overstatement due to biases in the literature. All the same, this number still bring to light that not all ecotourism is doing its job. Krüger (2005) finds that certain countries and areas are more susceptible to unsustainable ecotourism than others. For instance, Africa and Asia have less sustainable ecotourism than in other cases and mountain or island destinations appear to attract unsustainable ecotourism too.
Wells (1992)
suggests that the five main limits to
ecotourism are: absence of spectacular or readily visible natural features,
lack of infrastructure, ineffective marketing, difficulties in access and
political instability. This first is observed in Krügers (2005) paper since ecotourism cases with a flagship species tend to
be more sustainable than those without. A flagship species provides a face to
an ecotourism project; animals such as the lion are great as flagship species
because they are of universal interest and in need of conservation. Porini in Kenya is one such company that use the
lion as a front for their safaris. However, from what I can see there is a
general lack of integration that educates tourists about the conservation and
rather the money from the company is used in the conservation. While the money
may be going to where it is needed, I think it is important for the tourists to
be aware of how they are helping conserve the area they have come to see. The
other limits suggested by Wells (1992) may provide valid reasons for the
unsustainability of some ecotourism cases with lack of infrastructure and
political instability being common in both Africa and Asia. Mountains and
islands also tend to lack infrastructure and have difficulties in access.
Island ecosystems often have very delicate ecosystems which may make ecotourism
less viable as a means of funding conservation.
Tigers are another fantastic flagship species. Big rare mammals, birds and fish tend to make the best flagship species. Taken from: sopan-step.blogspot.co.uk |
No comments:
Post a Comment